news Geopolitical riskMarkets & trade Hellenic Shipping News
Supreme Court tariff ruling: It’s not just about refunds. Volume of U.S. freight trade could hinge on decision in World Economy News 16/01/2026 The looming U.S. Supreme Court decision on the legality of many of President Donald Trump’s tariffs has companies on edge as they eye potential refunds, but the ruling also could quickly influence the volume of trade to the U.S. ahead of Lunar New Year, according to logistics experts. The freight industry in the U.S. has been in a rate recession due to lower container volumes after companies front-loaded products to soften the impact of tariffs. The pulling forward of freight altered the traditional peak season of shipping container movement in 2025. If the tariffs implemented under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act are ruled to be illegal by the Supreme Court, imports to the U.S. may rise as companies feel more confident about their cash situation and seek an opening to buffer inventory ahead of any revised tariff plan from the Trump administration, which officials said will be ready to go and accomplish its existing trade goals. “If the IEEPA tariffs were to be removed from all imported goods, there would certainly be an increase in imports,” said Paul Brashier, vice president of global supply chain for ITS Logistics. “Especially for goods recently being sourced in higher-tariffed countries,” he said. The Supreme Court issued three decisions Wednesday morning, but the tariffs case was not among them. While Trump’s trade war hasn’t slowed Chinese trade with other nations — it just reported a record $1.2 trillion trade surplus — global ocean container volumes to the U.S. tracked by Sonar show a 14% decrease year over year. The higher tariffs forced some businesses to run with leaner inventories, with the drop in Chinese trade the most severe. Project44′s January Tariff Report estimates U.S. imports from China fell 28% year over year, while exports to China declined 38% in 2025. “This marked one of the sharpest bilateral trade contractions in recent history,” Project44 noted in its report. The Supreme Court decision comes at a critical time of year for supply chain management decisions within companies because factories shut down in China for a month in February for the Lunar New Year. Orders for the delivery of spring and summer freight need to be placed early to ensure the products leave the factories to be delivered in time to the U.S. The time frame for companies to place manufacturing orders for Lunar New Year is typically at the end of December or the beginning of January, to avoid the slowdown in production of their imports. According to Seko Logistics, the slowdown begins three to four weeks before Lunar New Year, as workers begin to start leaving the factories to head home. This year, the Lunar New Year falls between Feb. 17 and March 3. “If the Supreme Court does rule the tariffs illegal, this will absolutely impact orders with an increased demand for bookings for three reasons,” said Brian Bourke, chief commercial officer for Seko Logistics. “First, the timing of the Lunar New Year holiday. Second, we fully expect other tariff provisions to be used, but there are limits and implementation timelines that will encourage companies to ‘beat the clock’ again, and third is the expected infusion of future cash to fund these purchases.” If the tariffs are ruled illegal, the Court of International Trade has the legal authority to require refunds are paid to U.S. importers and reta
Supreme Court tariff ruling: It’s not just about refunds. Volume of U.S. freight trade could hinge on decision
Hellenic Shipping News
Read full article at Hellenic Shipping News →
Opens Hellenic Shipping News in a new tab